Re: pg_restore --clean vs. large object

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_restore --clean vs. large object
Date: 2009-07-21 13:46:25
Message-ID: 11485.1248183985@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> wrote:
>> i think this one could be applied, just as is... there is no need for
>> docs, because the issue being fixed is not documented... maybe that
>> should be in doc of older releases?

> Sure, it was an undocumented behavior. Should we need to add details
> of this patch to documentation?

The release note entry will be sufficient I think.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexey Klyukin 2009-07-21 13:47:47 errcontext support in PL/Perl
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-07-21 13:21:43 Re: git revisited