Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Single-Transaction Utility options

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Single-Transaction Utility options
Date: 2005-12-17 16:56:48
Message-ID: 1134838608.2964.135.camel@localhost.localdomain (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-patches
On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 15:56 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 13:59 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Would -1 work, or just confuse people?
> > That was my preference, I just thought it wouldn't be popular...
> > So I'll happily change that.
> OK.  While you're at it, I didn't like the long name either ;-).
> We do not use the abbrevation txn anywhere, so I think it's bad to
> introduce it here.  I'd vote for spelling out --single-transaction,
> or maybe just --single.  I believe you can abbreviate long switch names
> to any unique prefix, so there's not really any more typing here.

Changes as discussed. "singletransaction.patch" attached.

-1 or --single-transaction

Functions work as described.

Best Regards, Simon Riggs

Attachment: singletransaction.patch
Description: text/x-patch (9.3 KB)

In response to


pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2005-12-17 19:03:52
Subject: Re: Single-Transaction Utility options
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-12-17 16:25:51
Subject: Re: TODO Item - Add system view to show free space map

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group