Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: ddl triggers

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Barnali <barnali(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ddl triggers
Date: 2005-06-01 08:13:35
Message-ID: 1117613615.3844.862.camel@localhost.localdomain (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 2005-05-31 at 11:13 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Barnali <barnali(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in> writes:
> > I was wondering whether it will be useful to extend postgreSQL support 
> > to ddl triggers.
> This has been proposed and rejected before ... see the archives.

Could we keep track of NOT TODO items also?

The list of ideas suggested but then rejected is growing longer and we
rely on people's memory to say what was rejected previously.

The question is where do you put this idea if you reject it? :-)

Best Regards, Simon Riggs

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Nithin SontineniDate: 2005-06-01 08:14:49
Subject: regarding storage in postgres
Previous:From: Michael GlaesemannDate: 2005-06-01 07:29:58
Subject: Re: Interval->day proposal

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group