Re: ddl triggers

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Barnali <barnali(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ddl triggers
Date: 2005-06-01 08:13:35
Message-ID: 1117613615.3844.862.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 2005-05-31 at 11:13 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Barnali <barnali(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in> writes:
> > I was wondering whether it will be useful to extend postgreSQL support
> > to ddl triggers.
>
> This has been proposed and rejected before ... see the archives.

Could we keep track of NOT TODO items also?

The list of ideas suggested but then rejected is growing longer and we
rely on people's memory to say what was rejected previously.

The question is where do you put this idea if you reject it? :-)

Best Regards, Simon Riggs

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nithin Sontineni 2005-06-01 08:14:49 regarding storage in postgres
Previous Message Michael Glaesemann 2005-06-01 07:29:58 Re: Interval->day proposal