| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> |
| Cc: | Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] Incorrect FTS result with GIN index |
| Date: | 2010-07-29 14:03:07 |
| Message-ID: | 11087.1280412187@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> writes:
> I also wonder why did I get "right" result :) Just repeated the query:
> test=# select count(*) from search_tab where (to_tsvector('german', keywords ) @@ to_tsquery('german', 'ee:* & dd:*'));
> count
> -------
> 123
> (1 row)
Yeah, that case works (though I think it's unnecessarily slow). The one
that gives the wrong answer is the equivalent form with two AND'ed @@
operators.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2010-07-29 14:06:58 | Re: Danger of idiomatic plpgsql loop for merging data |
| Previous Message | venkat | 2010-07-29 12:58:26 | How to get geometry enabled Tables form Postgresql/postgis |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-07-29 14:35:02 | Re: page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2010-07-29 13:21:55 | review: xml_is_well_formed |