Re: pgdump

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreak(at)officenet(dot)no>
Cc: Enrico <scotty(at)linuxtime(dot)it>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgdump
Date: 2005-01-17 04:22:55
Message-ID: 1105935775.22946.7.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 2005-01-14 at 16:24 +0100, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
> http://dev.officenet.no/~andreak/pg_dump.c.diff

Looks good, except for some minor code cleanups and doc updates. Barring
any objections, I'll clean it up and apply it once we branch 8.0. I
suppose for consistency we ought to allow multiple schemas to be
specified via the "-n" option?

(Speaking of which, is the plan still to branch 8.0 very shortly after
the 8.0.0 final release?)

-Neil

In response to

  • Re: pgdump at 2005-01-14 15:24:51 from Andreas Joseph Krogh

Responses

  • Re: pgdump at 2005-01-17 04:42:23 from Bruce Momjian

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-01-17 04:42:23 Re: pgdump
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2005-01-17 02:35:40 Re: Latest Turkish translation updates