Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pgdump

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreak(at)officenet(dot)no>
Cc: Enrico <scotty(at)linuxtime(dot)it>,pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgdump
Date: 2005-01-17 04:22:55
Message-ID: 1105935775.22946.7.camel@localhost.localdomain (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 2005-01-14 at 16:24 +0100, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:

Looks good, except for some minor code cleanups and doc updates. Barring
any objections, I'll clean it up and apply it once we branch 8.0. I
suppose for consistency we ought to allow multiple schemas to be
specified via the "-n" option?

(Speaking of which, is the plan still to branch 8.0 very shortly after
the 8.0.0 final release?)


In response to

  • Re: pgdump at 2005-01-14 15:24:51 from Andreas Joseph Krogh


  • Re: pgdump at 2005-01-17 04:42:23 from Bruce Momjian

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-01-17 04:42:23
Subject: Re: pgdump
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2005-01-17 02:35:40
Subject: Re: Latest Turkish translation updates

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group