Re: BUG #19483: pg_upgrade fails with orphan records in pg_init_priv catalog table

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: huseyin(dot)d3r(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #19483: pg_upgrade fails with orphan records in pg_init_priv catalog table
Date: 2026-06-07 15:51:59
Message-ID: 104812.1780847519@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> 5. Verify orphan records remain in pg_init_privs:

> Thanks for providing a failing use case. I ran this on a 18.3 server and
> found no orphaned rows - but I used the pg_stat_statements extension
> instead of pg_wait_sampling. Could you try your experiment using
> pg_stat_statements? And could you also show us the contents of the errant
> rows in pg_init_privs for the failing case?

The orphaned-rows problem shouldn't exist in v17 and later (see
534287403, 35dd40d34, and related commits). The OP is apparently
complaining about an upgrade from v14, where such rows could exist.

I don't especially care for the proposed fix of making pg_upgrade
refuse to run. Manually correcting such situations would be tedious
and error-prone. Plus, it's inconsistent with what we did about
related issues with role GRANTs (see 29d75b25b and 74b4438a7).
I wonder if it'd be sane for pg_dump to just skip dangling role
references in pg_init_privs.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Previous Message Hüseyin Demir 2026-06-07 10:53:07 Re: BUG #19483: pg_upgrade fails with orphan records in pg_init_priv catalog table