Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

AW: AW: [HACKERS] Re: PostgreSQL reference manual

From: Zeugswetter Andreas <andreas(dot)zeugswetter(at)telecom(dot)at>
To: "'Bruce Momjian'" <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "'pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org>
Subject: AW: AW: [HACKERS] Re: PostgreSQL reference manual
Date: 1998-03-25 15:31:00
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> > 
>> David Gould writes:
>> > Consider also not updateing the grammar. The strength of PostgreSQL is that
>> > functions can be added to work inside the server. These functions can often
>> > do whatever is being proposed as new syntax.
>> So you want me to not check the syntax while parsing the embedded SQL code?
>What I think we was suggesting is that we add non-ANSI functionality as
>function calls rather than grammer changes with keywords.  The only
>disadvantage is that it is a little more cumbersom, and less intuitive
>for users.

but it ** is ** ANSI functionality, look under "role"  (with an O)



pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Michael MeskesDate: 1998-03-25 15:57:00
Subject: Re: AW: [HACKERS] Begin statement again
Previous:From: Zeugswetter AndreasDate: 1998-03-25 15:28:25
Subject: AW: [HACKERS] Begin statement again

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group