Re: Loose check was corrected of win32.mak.

From: "Hiroshi Saito" <z-saito(at)guitar(dot)ocn(dot)ne(dot)jp>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Loose check was corrected of win32.mak.
Date: 2007-10-02 10:04:25
Message-ID: 00fe01c804db$9cc208d0$c601a8c0@HP22720319231
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

From: "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
> + !MESSAGE nmake ended....
> + !ERROR Make aorted.
>
>
> Apart from the spelling error on the second line, do we need the first line
> at all? It kind of says the same thing, but does nmake require a fixed
> number of rows or so? If not, I'll just take that away before committing.

Ahhh...
!ERROR Make aorted.

Yeah Ok, Please only it.
Thanks!

Regards,
Hiroshi Saito

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Meskes 2007-10-02 10:23:10 Re: ecpg thread-safe descriptor
Previous Message Michael Meskes 2007-10-02 09:55:25 Re: ecpg thread-safe descriptor