Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [INTERFACES] Reply-To: missing

From: "Gregory W Burnham" <gburnham(at)sfu(dot)ca>
To: <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, "Ken J(dot) Wright" <ken(at)ori-ind(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Reply-To: missing
Date: 1999-06-30 15:58:40
Message-ID: 00d501bec311$6eda1940$ (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-interfaces
Does your email client have a 'reply to all' function?
That way you'll be replying to the person who wrote the
post, and the list.

Gregory W Burnham
Lead Technologist
Simon Fraser University
604 291 3615 (ph)
604 291 5679 (fx)
----- Original Message -----
From: Ken J. Wright <ken(at)ori-ind(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 1999 08:18 AM
Subject: [INTERFACES] Reply-To: missing

> I could not find on the PostgreSQL web site, who to send this to, so I'll
> just start here because at least I won't get bounced. There is no
> line in the messages recieved from this list. So just hitting reply in my
> mail client will always default To: to the sender of the original message.
> Consequently, I have to always remember to change the To: back to the
> or always cc: the list and know that the original sender is always getting
> two messages. Could this be changed? Or is there a good reason that it is,
> and should stay this way? This is the only list of many that I s-u-bscribe
> (<- without the dashes, this message bounced!) to that has this annoyance
> (for me). Anybody else?
> Cheers!
> Ken

In response to


pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: SilvioDate: 1999-06-30 15:58:57
Subject: subscribe
Previous:From: SilvioDate: 1999-06-30 15:50:07

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group