From: | "Gregory W Burnham" <gburnham(at)sfu(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, "Ken J(dot) Wright" <ken(at)ori-ind(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: [INTERFACES] Reply-To: missing |
Date: | 1999-06-30 15:58:40 |
Message-ID: | 00d501bec311$6eda1940$3d063a8e@educ.sfu.ca |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
Does your email client have a 'reply to all' function?
That way you'll be replying to the person who wrote the
post, and the list.
Gregory W Burnham
Lead Technologist
Excite
Simon Fraser University
604 291 3615 (ph)
604 291 5679 (fx)
----- Original Message -----
From: Ken J. Wright <ken(at)ori-ind(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 1999 08:18 AM
Subject: [INTERFACES] Reply-To: missing
> I could not find on the PostgreSQL web site, who to send this to, so I'll
> just start here because at least I won't get bounced. There is no
Reply-To:
> line in the messages recieved from this list. So just hitting reply in my
> mail client will always default To: to the sender of the original message.
> Consequently, I have to always remember to change the To: back to the
list,
> or always cc: the list and know that the original sender is always getting
> two messages. Could this be changed? Or is there a good reason that it is,
> and should stay this way? This is the only list of many that I s-u-bscribe
> (<- without the dashes, this message bounced!) to that has this annoyance
> (for me). Anybody else?
>
> Cheers!
>
> Ken
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Silvio | 1999-06-30 15:58:57 | subscribe |
Previous Message | Silvio | 1999-06-30 15:50:07 |