From: | Ivan Kartyshov <i(dot)kartyshov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
---|---|
To: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: make async slave to wait for lsn to be replayed |
Date: | 2017-03-09 12:49:15 |
Message-ID: | 001601f4-c70e-2fc2-c45a-8d8192ae9d77@postgrespro.ru |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello
On 07.03.2017 15:58, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> I've read the discussion so far but I didn't see the reason why you've
> changed it to as a contrib module. Could you tell me about that?
I did it on the initiative of our customer, who preferred the
implementation in the form of contrib. Contrib realization of WAITLSN
adds to core the only hook.
On 07.03.2017 15:58, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> I guess this feature would be more useful if provided as a core
> feature and we need to discuss about syntax as Thomas mentioned.
Here I attached rebased patch waitlsn_10dev_v3 (core feature)
I will leave the choice of implementation (core/contrib) to the
discretion of the community.
Will be glad to hear your suggestion about syntax, code and patch.
--
Ivan Kartyshov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
waitlsn_10dev_v3_rebased.patch | text/x-patch | 21.2 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-03-09 12:49:49 | Re: Gather Merge |
Previous Message | Naytro Naytro | 2017-03-09 12:47:35 | Performance issue after upgrading from 9.4 to 9.6 |