Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

RE: [HACKERS] Re: [DOCS] Last call?

From: "Taral" <taral(at)mail(dot)utexas(dot)edu>
To: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: "PostgreSQL-development" <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Re: [DOCS] Last call?
Date: 1998-10-25 23:29:22
Message-ID: 000501be006f$4bd0d660$3b291f0a@taral (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Err.. umm... Updated 10/25 17:05 CST. The following tests fail on my system
(RH 5.1 - glibc):

int2, int4: Different error format
(Math result not representable is now Numerical result out of range)
float8: Weird... one query that was supposed to fail returned a bunch of
NaNs, another failed when it wasn't supposed to with an out of range error.
geometry: The results are only approximately right... but only in the first
sig. figure :(
datetime: CDT/CST thing
sanity_check: **backend aborts**
random: Fails because it returns a value outside the 80-120 range
misc: Rows out of order

I'm afraid this one can't go as 'supported'. Sorry.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
> [mailto:owner-pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org]On Behalf Of Thomas G.
> Lockhart
> Sent: Sunday, October 25, 1998 4:58 PM
> To: Taral
> Cc: Terry Mackintosh; PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [DOCS] Last call?
> > I compiled it on RH 5.1... no problems.
> OK. Just to be unambiguous, I'd prefer a statement that includes "...
> and passed all regression tests". It did, right?
>                   - Tom

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: TaralDate: 1998-10-25 23:37:15
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Re: [DOCS] Last call?
Previous:From: Keith ParksDate: 1998-10-25 23:25:14
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Last call?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group