RE: [GENERAL] Long update query ? (also Re: [GENERAL] CNF vs. DNF)

From: "Taral" <taral(at)mail(dot)utexas(dot)edu>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "PostgreSQL-development" <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: RE: [GENERAL] Long update query ? (also Re: [GENERAL] CNF vs. DNF)
Date: 1998-10-02 16:37:15
Message-ID: 000201bdee22$e9c8ed80$3b291f0a@taral
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

> This is interesting. Check CNF size and DNF size. Choose smallest.
> CNF uses existing code, DNF converts to UNIONs. How do you return the
> proper rows with/without proper duplicates?

Create a temporary oid hash? (for each table selected on, I guess)

Taral

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1998-10-02 16:40:56 Re: [GENERAL] Long update query ? (also Re: [GENERAL] CNF vs. DNF)
Previous Message Martin Schulze 1998-10-02 15:39:57 Re: [GENERAL] Re: More PostgreSQL stuff

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1998-10-02 16:37:23 Re: [HACKERS] indices: ~* / text_ops
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-10-02 16:26:04 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items