On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Thanks for the review. Committed with revisions along the lines you suggest.
Bruce suggested to me off-list that when I commit a patch with
revisions, I ought to attach the committed patch to the email in which
I say that I have committed it. I know that Bruce habitually does
this, but I've never found it very helpful, since I prefer to look at
the patch either using the pgsql-committers emails or the git
respository. On the other hand, Bruce tells me he's received positive
feedback on the way he does it.
After some off-list discussion, we thought it would be good to ask the
list for feedback on this topic - is it helpful to attach the
patch-as-committed to the -hackers email, or is it just duplicative of
what's already available elsewhere?
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Korry Douglas||Date: 2010-04-20 16:00:23|
|Subject: Why does TRIM() expect an expr_list?|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-04-20 15:24:43|
|Subject: Re: CTAS not honoring NOT NULL, DEFAULT modifiers |