From: | JEDIDIAH <jedi(at)nomad(dot)mishnet> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] High Availability - Performace Scalability - |
Date: | 2004-09-30 15:36:23 |
Message-ID: | slrncloadi.8ae.jedi@nomad.mishnet |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-general |
On 2004-08-18, Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> wrote:
> Jerome,
>
> I'm curious what you expect out of clustering. High Availability, and
> Load Balancing seem possible, but Performance ? I would think there is a
> cost associated with clustering, that degrades performance.
Data in an RDBMS application should be localised enough that you
should be able to evenly split the workload over a number of cluster
nodes and not have them step on each other's toes too much. It's a difficult
problem but not insurmountable.
[deletia]
--
Negligence will never equal intent, no matter how you
attempt to distort reality to do so. This is what separates |||
the real butchers from average Joes (or Fritzes) caught up in / | \
events not in their control.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | akanksha kulkarni | 2004-09-30 15:43:18 | reconstructing database |
Previous Message | Duane Winner | 2004-09-30 15:35:56 | grant command: wildcard on tables? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Claudia Restrepo Pajon - Practicante Sistemas | 2004-09-30 16:13:54 | POSTGRES |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-09-30 14:48:51 | Re: problems with lower() and unicode-databases |