Re: making an unlogged table logged

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "A(dot)M(dot)" <agentm(at)themactionfaction(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: making an unlogged table logged
Date: 2011-01-07 08:24:23
Message-ID: m2sjx5cea0.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Adding logical replication would be a lot of
> work but we'd get a lot of collateral benefits. Imagine that PG had

There has been extensive discussions at last pgcon about that (mainly in
the "hallway track", but also in the devroom we had) to work on getting
the common bits between the slony and londiste queuing solutions into
core, to support what you're saying.

In fact we already have the txid datatype and its functions, those came
from slony through PGQ into core.

Jan Wieck started a discussion back then to offer the basics we need in
core as far as queuing goes, here:

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-05/msg01209.php

What happened to that effort?
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nicolas Barbier 2011-01-07 10:01:44 Re: join functions
Previous Message Florian Weimer 2011-01-07 08:21:41 Re: WIP: Range Types