Re: [HACKERS] A further thought on rule string size

From: wieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck)
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] A further thought on rule string size
Date: 2000-02-28 07:22:06
Message-ID: m12PKVK-0003kGC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > Removing the labels would actually save code in readfuncs.c, which
> > wouldn't have to skip over them. In outfuncs.c, we could either
> > have every node-writing subroutine know about two output modes, or
> > make a post-pass that strips anything that looks like a field label.
> > The latter would be less maintenance work in the long run.
> >
> > Comments?
>
> If you could keep the labels just for EXPLAIN, go for it.

Not right now, put it onto TODO for after 7.0.

Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#========================================= wieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) #

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2000-02-28 07:34:43 Re: [HACKERS] update_pg_pwd trigger does not work very well
Previous Message Hiroshi Inoue 2000-02-28 07:16:43 RE: [HACKERS] Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN