Hello All,

Doing recently the CLUSTER operation with (SELECT .. ORDER BY ...) instead
of CLUSTER I realized that that operation requires the free space equal to 
twice! the size of the table size :-( (which is unfortunately a serious 
drawback of the SELECT method, comparing to the plain CLUSTER for 
the large tables )...

So, I send the small doc-patch saying about the space requirement of the 
cluster operation using SELECT ORDER BY.

Regards,
 	Sergey

*******************************************************************
Sergey E. Koposov
Max Planck Institute for Astronomy/Sternberg Astronomical Institute
Tel: +49-6221-528-349
Web: http://lnfm1.sai.msu.ru/~math
E-mail: math(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)ru

"Sergey E. Koposov" <math(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)ru> writes:
> So, I send the small doc-patch saying about the space requirement of the 
> cluster operation using SELECT ORDER BY.

Added, along with some other minor editorial fixes.

			regards, tom lane