Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Encodings and docs

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Encodings and docs
Date: 2005-01-15 22:47:27
Message-ID: 200501152247.j0FMlRp23245@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw)
Is this open item complete?

	* synchonize supported encodings and docs

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Encodings and docs
Date: 2005-01-15 23:46:47
Message-ID: 13057.1105832807@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw)
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Is this open item complete?
> 	* synchonize supported encodings and docs

Seems to be.  As far as I can tell from looking in the archives, the
question came up when we added WIN1250 to the set of allowed server
encodings.  But it is now shown in both tables in section 20.2, so
I think we are set.

			regards, tom lane


Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2013 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group