Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Time complexity of statements

From: Sebastjan Trepca <trepca(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Time complexity of statements
Date: 2006-02-14 15:13:03
Message-ID: cd329af80602140713p41d8b5e1sf5f19fd0bccb3f43@mail.gmail.com (view raw)
Hi everybody!

As I understood from books and docs every statement in Postgres takes
O(1) because of it's versioning system, right?

I'm talking about INSERT,UPDATE,SELECT and DELETE statement.

Is it true? or did I get it wrong.

I'm specially interested in UPDATE statement. We'll have lots of them.

Thanks, Sebastjan

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Sebastjan Trepca <trepca(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Time complexity of statements
Date: 2006-02-14 15:29:43
Message-ID: 15084.1139930983@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw)
Sebastjan Trepca <trepca(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> As I understood from books and docs every statement in Postgres takes
> O(1) because of it's versioning system, right?

Finding an existing row is not O(1), so this is not the case for
anything but INSERT.  You also have to consider index update costs,
foreign key checking costs if applicable, etc etc.

			regards, tom lane

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Sebastjan Trepca <trepca(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Time complexity of statements
Date: 2006-02-14 15:31:30
Message-ID: 200602141631.31765.peter_e@gmx.net (view raw)
Am Dienstag, 14. Februar 2006 16:13 schrieb Sebastjan Trepca:
> As I understood from books and docs every statement in Postgres takes
> O(1) because of it's versioning system, right?

Absolutely not.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

From: Sebastjan Trepca <trepca(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Time complexity of statements
Date: 2006-02-14 17:03:23
Message-ID: cd329af80602140903k2958490dm2c506f678bcd4304@mail.gmail.com (view raw)
Ok, thanks. I guess that was a stupid question, sorry :)

I guess we'll have to use INSERTs instead of UPDATEs.

Sebastjan


On 2/14/06, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 14. Februar 2006 16:13 schrieb Sebastjan Trepca:
> > As I understood from books and docs every statement in Postgres takes
> > O(1) because of it's versioning system, right?
>
> Absolutely not.
>
> --
> Peter Eisentraut
> http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
>


Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2013 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group