Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Re: Is CVS HEAD open for 8.1 commits?
Is CVS HEAD open for 8.1 commits? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
Bruce Momjian wrote: > Is CVS HEAD open for 8.1 commits? I have confirmed with Marc that it is open. I am making the 8.1 stamps now. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes: > Is CVS HEAD open for 8.1 commits? I'm not convinced Marc got the branching/tagging right; let's wait till the dust settles. Are you in such a hurry? Most of what's in the 8.1 queue hasn't been reviewed yet anyway. regards, tom lane
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes: > > Is CVS HEAD open for 8.1 commits? > > I'm not convinced Marc got the branching/tagging right; let's wait till > the dust settles. I IM'ed him and he said to go ahead. > Are you in such a hurry? Most of what's in the 8.1 queue hasn't been > reviewed yet anyway. Neil Conway wanted to get started and I did the file stamps too so those are ready. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> I'm not convinced Marc got the branching/tagging right; let's wait till >> the dust settles. > I IM'ed him and he said to go ahead. Maybe he said that, but I see no evidence that he's tagged 8.0.0 correctly. If you touch the repository you'll make it materially harder to fix this. So HOLD OFF, please. regards, tom lane
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> I'm not convinced Marc got the branching/tagging right; let's wait till > >> the dust settles. > > > I IM'ed him and he said to go ahead. > > Maybe he said that, but I see no evidence that he's tagged 8.0.0 > correctly. If you touch the repository you'll make it materially > harder to fix this. So HOLD OFF, please. Too late, sorry. Marc says the 8.0.0 is a tag and a branch. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes: >>> Tom Lane wrote: >>>> I'm not convinced Marc got the branching/tagging right; let's wait till >>>> the dust settles. >> >>> I IM'ed him and he said to go ahead. >> >> Maybe he said that, but I see no evidence that he's tagged 8.0.0 >> correctly. If you touch the repository you'll make it materially >> harder to fix this. So HOLD OFF, please. > > Too late, sorry. Marc says the 8.0.0 is a tag and a branch. Note that REL8_0_STABLE is the tag/branch ... HEAD should be clear to commit to ... the error that Tom was eluding to was that I had mis-named the original branch as REL8_0_0, instead of REL8_0_STABLE ... if someone knows how to safely remove a branch that has had no commits made to it, please let me know, but from reading the docs, the suggestions that seemed to be suggested had very big *BEWARE* signs around them ... tags are easy to move around and remove, branches, apparently, aren't so simple ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Tue, 18 Jan 2005, Bruce Momjian wrote: > >> Tom Lane wrote: >> >>> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes: >>> >>>> Tom Lane wrote: >>>> >>>>> I'm not convinced Marc got the branching/tagging right; let's wait >>>>> till >>>>> the dust settles. >>>> >>> >>>> I IM'ed him and he said to go ahead. >>> >>> >>> Maybe he said that, but I see no evidence that he's tagged 8.0.0 >>> correctly. If you touch the repository you'll make it materially >>> harder to fix this. So HOLD OFF, please. >> >> >> Too late, sorry. Marc says the 8.0.0 is a tag and a branch. > > > Note that REL8_0_STABLE is the tag/branch ... HEAD should be clear to > commit to ... the error that Tom was eluding to was that I had > mis-named the original branch as REL8_0_0, instead of REL8_0_STABLE > ... if someone knows how to safely remove a branch that has had no > commits made to it, please let me know, but from reading the docs, the > suggestions that seemed to be suggested had very big *BEWARE* signs > around them ... > > tags are easy to move around and remove, branches, apparently, aren't > so simple ... > > Quite so. Only by direct hacking on the ,v files, AFAIK - i.e. NOT something to be done except in dire emergency. As long as nobody commits to the branch is there any harm done by leaving it there? I presume all the committers know which branch they should be committing to (and also that most other than Tom only rarely commit to anything other than HEAD) cheers andrew
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 at 11:53, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > ... if someone knows how to safely remove a branch that has had no > commits made to it, please let me know, a little bit of googling brought me to this: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-cvs/2003-11/msg00166.html --- snip --- > How can the name of a tag that is a branch point be changed [...] cvs admin -n newname:oldname cvs tag -Bd oldname --- snap --- cu Reinhard
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > Quite so. Only by direct hacking on the ,v files, AFAIK - i.e. NOT > something to be done except in dire emergency. As long as nobody commits > to the branch is there any harm done by leaving it there? I presume all > the committers know which branch they should be committing to (and also > that most other than Tom only rarely commit to anything other than HEAD) This is what we figured, I just wanted to make sure that I wasn't overlooking something ... risk is minimal, but eliminating it would have been nice if possible :) ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664