Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Proposed new policy for Training events

From: Guido Barosio <gbarosio(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposed new policy for Training events
Date: 2009-06-30 17:09:20
Message-ID: f7f6b4c70906301009s7dea8c1bv5294243a3820b671@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www
JD, thoughts are thoughts, appreciate your input. BUT, we need to take
an action on this matter. And that is what Josh is asking for, whereas
I also agree with him.

BTW: What do you mean by "moderators should practice better discretion" ?

Yours,
GB.-

On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Joshua D. Drake<jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 13:56 -0300, Guido Barosio wrote:
>> This is not a moderation problem.
>>
>
> I do not agree. Certain companies who submit don't actually fulfill
> their classes. They spam with potential classes in hopes to fill it and
> keep there name out there.
>
> Joshua D. Drake
>
>
> --
> PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake(at)jabber(dot)postgresql(dot)org
>   Consulting, Development, Support, Training
>   503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
>   The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997
>
>

In response to

Responses

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2009-06-30 17:20:53
Subject: Re: Proposed new policy for Training events
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2009-06-30 16:59:54
Subject: Re: Proposed new policy for Training events

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group