Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Recommended/Not Recommended Hosts?

From: Jon Asher <jon(dot)asher(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Livni <josh(at)umbrellaconsulting(dot)com>, SF Postgres <sfpug(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Recommended/Not Recommended Hosts?
Date: 2009-12-10 19:54:00
Message-ID: d24c7af0912101154t3fbd791cw926dce06747a17ab@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: sfpug
>
> > Pure curiosity on my part here ... I use EC2 a bit, tho not as much as
> > the serious users.  A few large and small instances on all the time, and
> > I boot up new ones for shorter periods all the time.   First - I've
> > never had any issue getting my instances fulfilled right away (I always
> > use EAST-C, but perhaps other datacenters are generally more full, or
> > you are trying to boot up many tens of servers at once?).
>
> Yeah, the two issues I've had are (a) requisitioning high-end instances
> (like 32G/16core instances) and (b) allocating a lot at once.  Sometimes
> instances just "aren't available" and there's no way to find out when
> they will be available.
>
> > Also, when you say they are slow, do you mean in terms of $/cycle,
> > or you wish you had burst access to other users unused cycles like on
> > some other vps offerings? something else?
>
> I mean that if you have an 8core/16GB instance, the actual processing
> throughput you get is about 1/6 to 1/4 that of a new HP DL380 machine
> with 8cores and 16GB.  So you really need 4x as many EC2 instances to
> match bare metal.  Partly this is due to CPU-stealing, and partly to
> erratic and lag-prone I/O, and partly to the fact that a lot of machines
> in the EC2 pool are 4 years old.
>
> > I like the bundle of offerings that AWS provides (EBS, especially), and
> > I've personally had great experience w/them (fwiw I've also had great
> > experience w/slicehost) -- but if I am getting missing out on how
> > they're screwing me, for example by stealing my CPU, I'd definitely love
> > to learn more.
>
> On EC2, other VMs on the same hardware are permitted to "steal" portions
> of the CPU which are allocated to you.  So at any given time, you may
> have as little as 50% of the CPUs you're being billed for.  And, when
> CPU availability is fluctuating up and down (as it does on EC2), real
> throughput tends to be based on the slowest second rather than peak
> availablity.  Most Linux apps, especially databases, do quite poorly
> with erratic resource availability.
>
> --Josh
>

For a dev environment running a small database, we've had a great experience
with Rackspace cloud servers.  The price point for server instances is
around $10 per 256 MB which is the low end for cloud services.

In response to

sfpug by date

Next:From: Jason DiCioccioDate: 2009-12-10 19:55:11
Subject: Re: Recommended/Not Recommended Hosts?
Previous:From: Jason DiCioccioDate: 2009-12-10 19:52:22
Subject: Re: Recommended/Not Recommended Hosts?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group