On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> On Monday 15 February 2010 08:13:32 Tom Lane wrote:
>> Actually, looking closer, some of the Windows machines started failing
>> after the *earlier* patch to add directory fsyncs.
> And not only the windows machines. Seems sensible to add a configure check
> whether directory-fsyncing works.
It looks like a thing that can be filesystem-dependent. Maybe a kind
of runtime check?
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Fujii Masao||Date: 2010-02-15 09:40:36|
|Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #4566: pg_stop_backup() reports incorrect STOP WAL LOCATION|
|Previous:||From: Leonardo F||Date: 2010-02-15 09:33:34|
|Subject: Re: [FWD] About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch|
pgsql-committers by date
|Next:||From: Andres Freund||Date: 2010-02-15 10:02:50|
|Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Speed up CREATE DATABASE by deferring the fsyncs until after|
|Previous:||From: Takahiro Itagaki||Date: 2010-02-15 09:27:12|
|Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add psql tab completion for DO blocks. |