From: | Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Craig Ringer <ringerc(at)ringerc(dot)id(dot)au> |
Cc: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>, Mike Fowler <mike(at)mlfowler(dot)com>, Guillaume Cottenceau <gc(at)mnc(dot)ch>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Moving to git |
Date: | 2011-10-04 07:03:09 |
Message-ID: | alpine.BSO.2.00.1110040247070.5442@leary.csoft.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
On Tue, 4 Oct 2011, Craig Ringer wrote:
> To what extent is *perfect* history reproduction required for PgJDBC?
>
Perfect history is not a requirement. Largely because of the massive
rewrite in the 8.0 timeframe there's not much utility in looking back much
further. Still, imperfect history better have a good explanation for its
existence. The server project had several suspect commits that they
reconciled with their saved source trees rather than discarding. I don't
think the JDBC driver has nearly as many suspect commits, but I don't see
why it would be hard to accurately import our history.
My only caveat is for those who think git-cvsimport is adequate:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-www/2008-12/msg00124.php
Kris Jurka
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Cramer | 2011-10-04 08:35:24 | Re: Moving to git |
Previous Message | Maciek Sakrejda | 2011-10-04 05:55:43 | Re: Moving to git |