Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCH] DefaultACLs

From: Nikhil Sontakke <nikhil(dot)sontakke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Petr Jelinek <pjmodos(at)pjmodos(dot)net>, Joshua Tolley <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] DefaultACLs
Date: 2009-07-23 06:55:39
Message-ID: a301bfd90907222355q53cfee8fo1001a3fae5359023@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi,

>
>> Anyway, while this patch might not necessary get commited in this commit
>> fest, I'd still like to have opinion from one of the commiters on "the VIEW
>> problem" which also affects grant on all patch ( see
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-07/msg00957.php ) and I
>> fear "returned with feedback" might prevent that until next commit fest.
>
> OK, hopefully one of them will chime in with an opinion.  As I say, I
> would like to see this get committed if it's done, I just wasn't sure
> it was.  But now it seems that was due to insufficiently careful
> reading of the thread, with the exception of this issue and the need
> to finish the docs.
>

IMO, the committers should have a go at the "GRANT ON ALL" (simpler
than DefaultACLs) patch first. Whatever consensus is arrived for the
VIEW issue as part of its review can then spill over to the
DefaultACLs patch too.

As mentioned by Petr, he does not seem to be in a hurry to get the
DefaultACLs patch in, in this commitfest..

Regards,
Nikhils
-- 
http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2009-07-23 07:04:09
Subject: Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on Windows
Previous:From: David E. WheelerDate: 2009-07-23 06:46:38
Subject: Re: Extension Facility

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group