From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Jackson, DeJuan" <djackson(at)cpsgroup(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | RE: [HACKERS] First mega-patch... |
Date: | 1998-03-17 17:37:20 |
Message-ID: | Pine.NEB.3.95.980317123453.500A-100000@hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 17 Mar 1998, Jackson, DeJuan wrote:
> Hey, I resemble that remark. But seriously I don't understand the need,
> in limiting the discussion of new features or patches to just this list.
> There are HACKERS-type things that pass through the QUESTIONS list all
Right, and they should be redirected as appropriate, *to* the
appropriate list...
> the time (usually posted to both). Of course I'll admit that I've never
> tried to manage anything with this scope or deal with the standard
> Postgres users (I know we can be annoying), so I do see the potential
> for the abuse. (Start accent here --) But here in Texas we don't shoot
> the horse until he's broken his leg (-- end accent).
I'd prefer to never have to shoot the horse myself...waste of a
fine animal :)
Seriously, at least in my case, I run procmail to filter my
mail...I tend to read everything that goes to hackers, while skim through
the other lists as appropriate...I'm subscribed to *all* the lists, which
makes for several hundred messages per day...I like to automate the
sorting as much as possible...
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jackson, DeJuan | 1998-03-17 18:25:23 | RE: [HACKERS] First mega-patch... |
Previous Message | Jackson, DeJuan | 1998-03-17 17:11:57 | RE: [HACKERS] First mega-patch... |