Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Improve XLOG_NO_TRAN related comments

From: Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Improve XLOG_NO_TRAN related comments
Date: 2005-12-25 02:50:52
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.58.0512242149220.7810@eon.cs (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

On Sat, 24 Dec 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Removing these comments entirely, without changing the code they explain,
> doesn't strike me as an improvement.
>

Well, I still kept the XLOG_NO_TRAN and collect repeated comments to
xlog.h where it is defined.

Regards,
Qingqing

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Sagi BashariDate: 2005-12-25 09:34:42
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #2120: Crash when doing UTF8<->ISO_8859_8
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-12-25 02:44:12
Subject: Re: Improve XLOG_NO_TRAN related comments

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group