Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Tablespace patch review

From: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Tablespace patch review
Date: 2004-06-18 21:42:04
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.58.0406190740380.9005@linuxworld.com.au (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004, Tom Lane wrote:

> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >>> Are we ripping out our initlocation code at the same time?
> >>
> >> Not done yet, but it's dead and should be removed as soon as a
> >> decent respect for the deceased permits ;-)
>
> > You want me to do the honors?
>
> Nah, I'll get it.  I want to do some other small cleanup on that patch,
> too.  (But Gavin, you're on the hook for a rewrite of the admin guide
> section about alternate locations into something about tablespaces...)

I can either replace the "Alternative Locations" section or make a higher
level reference to tablespaces under Server Administration in the main
index. What do people think?

Gavin

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Gavin SherryDate: 2004-06-18 21:44:36
Subject: Re: Tablespace patch review
Previous:From: Carlos Guzmán ÁlvarezDate: 2004-06-18 20:23:57
Subject: Re: Timestamp format question

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Gavin SherryDate: 2004-06-18 21:44:36
Subject: Re: Tablespace patch review
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-06-18 20:23:10
Subject: Re: Tablespace patch review

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group