Re:

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re:
Date: 2002-09-12 22:08:53
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0209122014340.1307-100000@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian writes:

> Wow. That is clear. Why are we returning "year" as a double?

Because we've been doing that for many years.

> I would love to say that this is related to change in casts, but that
> isn't the case.

Sure it is. The float=>int casts need to be made implicit, or we'll have
tons of problems like this.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

  • Re: at 2002-09-12 16:15:16 from Bruce Momjian

Responses

  • Re: at 2002-09-13 04:46:00 from Tom Lane

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-09-12 22:09:02 Re: TOAST docs
Previous Message Gavin M. Roy 2002-09-12 21:42:26 Re: [GENERAL] Looking for more "big name" places that use PostgreSQL