Neil Conway writes:
> I'm curious; why is this "not the right fix"? According to the manpage:
> -l turns on maximum compatibility with the original
> AT&T lex implementation. Note that this does not
> mean full compatibility. Use of this option
> costs a considerable amount of performance...
The manpage also lists the specific incompatibilities. I think we should
not be affected by them, but someone better check before removing the -l.
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Christopher Kings-Lynne||Date: 2002-03-28 01:20:30|
|Subject: Re: Mailing List Question|
|Previous:||From: Neil Conway||Date: 2002-03-27 23:53:53|
|Subject: Re: compile bug in HEAD?|