Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pg_depend patch

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Rod Taylor <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_depend patch
Date: 2002-03-15 03:30:05
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0203142228571.970-100000@peter.localdomain (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Christopher Kings-Lynne writes:

> You have a view or a function or something that depends on another view.
> You want to update the view that these depend on.  Up until this patch is
> applied, you can just drop the view and recreate it and the things that
> depend on it will carry on working.

No they won't.  That's exactly the reason why we need this dependency
tracking.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net


In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-03-15 05:32:23
Subject: Re: JDBC arrays
Previous:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2002-03-15 03:06:31
Subject: Re: pg_depend patch

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group