Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: HISTORY file

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: HISTORY file
Date: 2001-12-24 13:18:18
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0112231842290.620-100000@peter.localdomain (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian writes:

> How do you want to go from here?  Do you want to maintain HISTORY, or do
> you want me to keep generating the raw list of items and let you mark
> them up?  Or do you want me to keep maintaining it and use your new
> template?  HISTORY needs updating with new stuff added in the past
> weeks.  How do you want to do that?

I think it would be most effective if when a significant change is checked
in, the release information is updated with it.  That way we don't have to
think months later what that obscure log message meant.  Also, it would
give users of snapshot releases an idea of what has happened so far.

I've updated the list I posted up to the 22nd and checked it in.  For the
hopefully few remaining additions I think it's OK to just update both
files, unless you want to do the reformatting.  (I used a program called
"links" to convert from HTML to text.)

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-12-24 14:16:47
Subject: Re: Possible bug in vacuum redo
Previous:From: Hannu KrosingDate: 2001-12-24 06:14:29
Subject: Re: Possible bug in vacuum redo

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group