Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [INTERFACES] Access'97 and ODBC

From: "Jose' Soares Da Silva" <sferac(at)bo(dot)nettuno(dot)it>
To: Tom Ivar Helbekkmo <tih+mail(at)Hamartun(dot)Priv(dot)NO>
Cc: "Jose' Soares" <sferac(at)nettuno(dot)it>, interfaces postgres <pgsql-interfaces(at)PostgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Access'97 and ODBC
Date: 1998-04-30 13:03:44
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.3.96.980430130257.1470A-100000@proxy.bazzanese.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-interfaces
On 30 Apr 1998, Tom Ivar Helbekkmo wrote:

> "Jose' Soares Da Silva" <sferac(at)bo(dot)nettuno(dot)it> writes:
> 
> > I vote for changing default date format to ISO-8601 to reflect
> > PostgreSQL documentation and for adherence to Standard SQL92.
> 
> Hear!  Hear!  Good standards beat silly conventions any day!
> 
Seems that you don't like conventions Tom, but you want
that all world use dates with American format.
Seems that you want impose one convention.
We're working with a database which name is PostgreSQL.
I suppose that you know what's mean the last 3 letters.
                                                           Jose' 


Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Thomas G. LockhartDate: 1998-04-30 13:08:17
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Access'97 and ODBC
Previous:From: Andreas ZeugswetterDate: 1998-04-30 12:32:32
Subject: AW: [HACKERS] data compression/encryption

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: Thomas G. LockhartDate: 1998-04-30 13:08:17
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Access'97 and ODBC
Previous:From: Tom Ivar HelbekkmoDate: 1998-04-30 07:44:30
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Access'97 and ODBC

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group