Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Misc. consequences of backend memory management changes

From: Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Misc. consequences of backend memory management changes
Date: 2000-06-28 19:40:35
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.3.96.1000628213159.20347A-100000@ara.zf.jcu.cz (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 28 Jun 2000, Karel Zak wrote:

> 
> About context tree --- what will happen if in PG will exist some context 
> that not will in context tree? Yes, it is curios question...explication: 
>  I have in the query cache contexts (for each plan) that are persisten (in 
> shmem) across connection (and across TopMemoryContext live-time). How 
> integrate this context to the contect tree? Or skip for this specific 
> variant context type independent MemoryContextCreate and init this common 
> part itself? - (I vote for this)

 I a little speculate about it and I mean that query cache contexts can be
in separate contest tree based on master query cache context that is create
during global shmem initialization. Agree?

						Karel


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Hiroshi InoueDate: 2000-06-28 23:53:03
Subject: Re: Big 7.1 open items
Previous:From: pgsql-hackersDate: 2000-06-28 19:25:41
Subject: Re: 7.0.2 on Solaris

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group