Re: NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE

From: Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE
Date: 2000-06-09 16:04:51
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.3.96.1000609175240.4345A-100000@ara.zf.jcu.cz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches


On Fri, 9 Jun 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Applied. I had a little trouble getting the patch to apply cleanly.
> Seems some code has moved, and the patch actually put it in the wrong
> place in two cases. The context wasn't large enough. I think I got
> them all in the right place.

Hmm, a question is if this patch will have long lifetime. Possible is that
new ACL (etc.) implement some features from this patch.

But, I mean that CREATE TABLE restriction is needful in large multiuser
projects.

BWT. --- if Peter implement new ACL, I plan 'CREATE PROFILE' feature for
better user control (connection idle time, default ACL mask
...etc.).

Thanks.
Karel

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-06-09 16:11:26 Re: NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-06-09 16:02:39 Re: odbc patches