Re: Replication Syatem

From: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
To: Gauri Kanekar <meetgaurikanekar(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Replication Syatem
Date: 2008-04-29 05:08:09
Message-ID: Pine.GSO.4.64.0804290104570.2503@westnet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, Gauri Kanekar wrote:

> Basically we have some background process which updates "table1" and we
> don't want the application to make any changes to "table1" while vacuum.
> Vacuum requires exclusive lock on "table1" and if any of the background or
> application is ON vacuum don't kick off.

VACUUM FULL needs an exclusive lock, the regular one does not in 8.1.
It's one of the reasons FULL should be avoided. If you do regular VACUUM
frequently enough, you shouldn't ever need to do a FULL one anyway.

--
* Greg Smith gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gauri Kanekar 2008-04-29 05:11:33 Re: Replication Syatem
Previous Message Gauri Kanekar 2008-04-29 04:55:10 Re: Replication Syatem