Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: jar naming consitency

From: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
To: Manuel Sugawara <masm(at)fciencias(dot)unam(dot)mx>
Cc: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: jar naming consitency
Date: 2005-02-04 18:22:29
Message-ID: Pine.BSO.4.56.0502041318290.15014@leary.csoft.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

On Fri, 4 Feb 2005, Manuel Sugawara wrote:

> I'd like to see consistency in the jars naming, for instance, in the
> change between 310 and 309:
> 
> postgresql-8.0-310.jdbc2.jar
> postgresql-8.0.309.jdbc2.jar
>               ^

This change was intentional to try and indicate that it is build 310 of 
the 8.0 driver series, not something to do with the postgresql minor 
version 310.  Additionally for build 310 the source package name was 
changed postgresql-8.0.309.src.tar.gz to 
postgresql-jdbc-8.0-310.src.tar.gz to try and differentiate it from the 
server as well.  We think we've finally hit upon a reasonable convention 
and do intend to stick with it.

Kris Jurka

In response to

Responses

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2005-02-04 19:01:25
Subject: Re: jar naming consitency
Previous:From: Manuel SugawaraDate: 2005-02-04 18:21:50
Subject: Re: jar naming consitency

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group