Re: jar naming consitency

From: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
To: Manuel Sugawara <masm(at)fciencias(dot)unam(dot)mx>
Cc: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: jar naming consitency
Date: 2005-02-04 18:22:29
Message-ID: Pine.BSO.4.56.0502041318290.15014@leary.csoft.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

On Fri, 4 Feb 2005, Manuel Sugawara wrote:

> I'd like to see consistency in the jars naming, for instance, in the
> change between 310 and 309:
>
> postgresql-8.0-310.jdbc2.jar
> postgresql-8.0.309.jdbc2.jar
> ^

This change was intentional to try and indicate that it is build 310 of
the 8.0 driver series, not something to do with the postgresql minor
version 310. Additionally for build 310 the source package name was
changed postgresql-8.0.309.src.tar.gz to
postgresql-jdbc-8.0-310.src.tar.gz to try and differentiate it from the
server as well. We think we've finally hit upon a reasonable convention
and do intend to stick with it.

Kris Jurka

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2005-02-04 19:01:25 Re: jar naming consitency
Previous Message Manuel Sugawara 2005-02-04 18:21:50 Re: jar naming consitency