On Tue, 18 Jan 2005, Oliver Siegmar wrote:
> The current infinity implementation in pgjdbc is a hack, because you have to
> set/get magic values that represents '-infinity' and 'infinity', but it is
> imho the best way to do until there might be an NEGATIVE_INFINITY and
> POSITIVE_INFINTIY for java.util.Date like the one for java.lang.Double.
Well, no one seems to have any better ideas, how about a better place for
the infinity constants. org.postgresql.jdbc2.TimestampUtils is not a
public interface. PGStatement?
In response to
pgsql-jdbc by date
|Next:||From: Oliver Siegmar||Date: 2005-01-21 08:07:45|
|Subject: Re: Problems with infinity|
|Previous:||From: Kris Jurka||Date: 2005-01-20 12:19:03|
|Subject: Re: DataSource|