Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

software vs hw hard on linux

From: Jeff <threshar(at)torgo(dot)978(dot)org>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: software vs hw hard on linux
Date: 2003-09-12 14:34:26
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.44.0309121030450.78908-100000@torgo.978.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
Due to various third party issues, and the fact PG rules, we're planning
on migrating our deplorable informix db to PG.  It is a rather large DB
with a rather high amount of activity (mostly updates).  So I'm going to
be aquiring a dual (or quad if they'll give me money) box. (In my testing
my glorious P2 with a 2 spindle raid0 is able to handle it fairly well)

What I'm wondering about is what folks experience with software raid vs
hardware raid on linux is.  A friend of mine ran a set of benchmarks at
work and found sw raid was running obscenely faster than the mylex and
(some other brand that isn't 3ware) raids..

On the pro-hw side you have ones with battery backed cache, chacnes are
they are less likely to fail..

On the pro-sw side you have lots of speed and less cost (unfortunately,
there is a pathetic budget so spending $15k on a raid card is out of the
question really).

any thoughts?

--
Jeff Trout <jeff(at)jefftrout(dot)com>
http://www.jefftrout.com/
http://www.stuarthamm.net/



Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: aturnerDate: 2003-09-12 14:49:24
Subject: Re: software vs hw hard on linux
Previous:From: Matt ClarkDate: 2003-09-12 11:06:12
Subject: Re: best arrangement of 3 disks for (insert) performance

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group