Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Re: Postgres vs. PostgreSQL

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: "Henry B(dot) Hotz" <hotz(at)jpl(dot)nasa(dot)gov>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: Postgres vs. PostgreSQL
Date: 2000-04-11 18:14:40
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.21.0004111514250.2814-100000@thelab.hub.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs
On Tue, 11 Apr 2000, Henry B. Hotz wrote:

> At 7:27 AM -0700 4/11/00, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> On Tue, 11 Apr 2000, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >>
> >> > Considering that there is up to this day no terminally universal way to
> >> > pronounce 'Linux' (unless you know Swedish :), I don't think that's worth
> >> > worrying about. Personally, I find PostgreSQL very pronouncable though.
> >>
> >> Me too: Post-Gres-Q-L ..
> >
> >Added to first FAQ item.
> 
> Maybe I'm too late, but can I cast a vote for the Southern California
> convention?

About 3 years too late ... 



In response to

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2000-04-11 21:45:17
Subject: Re: Updated docs needed for 7.0
Previous:From: Henry B. HotzDate: 2000-04-11 17:57:45
Subject: Re: Re: Postgres vs. PostgreSQL

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group