Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Re: NOT {NULL|DEFERRABLE} (was: bug in 7.0)

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, Jan Wieck <wieck(at)debis(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: NOT {NULL|DEFERRABLE} (was: bug in 7.0)
Date: 2000-02-29 20:05:23
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.21.0002291604380.434-100000@thelab.hub.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 29 Feb 2000, Don Baccus wrote:

> At 02:34 PM 2/29/00 -0400, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> 
> >IMHO, you should be on pgsql-general, not pgsql-hackers, as its obvious
> >that you need *release level* software ...
> 
> No problem, I'll unsubscribe.
> 
> >If, when we release, you are *still* having problems,please feel free to
> >let us know in a *NON* antagonistic way ...
> 
> Save bug reports until release?  OK, if that's what you want.

No, bug reports are most welcome, antagonistic comments aren't ... big
difference ...



In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Jan WieckDate: 2000-02-29 23:52:58
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: NOT {NULL|DEFERRABLE} (was: bug in 7.0)
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-02-29 19:49:53
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] having and union in v7beta

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group