Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [GENERAL] Re: Is PostgreSQL ready for mission criticalapplications?

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: marten(at)feki(dot)toppoint(dot)de
Cc: Stephen Birch <sbirch(at)ironmountainsystems(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-novice(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Re: Is PostgreSQL ready for mission criticalapplications?
Date: 1999-11-24 05:25:00
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.10.9911240123270.63896-100000@thelab.hub.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general
On Tue, 23 Nov 1999 marten(at)feki(dot)toppoint(dot)de wrote:

>  a) Due to the database layouts we are in need of doing all these nice
>     sql-statements like "group by" and "having" ... and as posted earlier
>     in this group: they're limited in PostgreSQL.

Since I use 'Group By' quite a bit...Having not so much...can you be more
specific on the problems?

>  b) We had problems with vacuumdb here and there. Some times it cored.
>     We've deleted a 300 MB database under psql and the backend cored ...

What version of PostgreSQL?

Marc G. Fournier                   ICQ#7615664               IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org 
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org           secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org 


In response to

Responses

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Adriaan JoubertDate: 1999-11-24 06:47:06
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions
Previous:From: Lincoln YeohDate: 1999-11-24 03:44:37
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] logging stuff in the right sequence.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group