Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Current sources?

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Current sources?
Date: 1998-05-23 19:41:46
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.3.96.980523164128.26778F-100000@thelab.hub.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sat, 23 May 1998, Tom Lane wrote:

> Well, the upshot from here is that having done "cvs checkout pgsql"
> once, I can do either
> 	cvs update			-- within pgsql
> 	cvs -d blahblah checkout pgsql	-- in parent directory
> and they both seem to work and do the same thing (although with no
> updates committed in the last two hours, it's hard to be sure).
> 
> If I omit the -d option to the cvs checkout, it fails; it does not
> know enough to fetch the repository address from pgsql/CVS/Root.
> But cvs update is cool.
> 
> Dunno why it doesn't work for Marc.  I'm running cvs 1.9; you?

	Yup, but I have a few suspicious on why it doesn't work that I'll
investigate on monday :)

Marc G. Fournier                                
Systems Administrator @ hub.org 
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org           secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org 


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 1998-05-23 20:51:03
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Current sources?
Previous:From: The Hermit HackerDate: 1998-05-23 19:41:03
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Current sources?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group