Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking?

From: "Ron Peacetree" <rjpeace(at)earthlink(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking?
Date: 2003-04-10 01:15:26
Message-ID: OA3la.16453$ey1.1419068@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


"Ron Peacetree" <rjpeace(at)earthlink(dot)net> wrote in message
news:eS0la(dot)16229$ey1(dot)1398978(at)newsread1(dot)prod(dot)itd(dot)earthlink(dot)net(dot)(dot)(dot)
> M$'s first implementation of threads was so "heavy" that it didn't
> help them (until they actually implemented real threads and called
> them "strings"),
TYPO ALERT: M$'s better implementation of threads is called "fibers",
not "strings"

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message ljb 2003-04-10 01:52:38 Re: More thoughts about FE/BE protocol
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-04-09 22:30:51 More thoughts about FE/BE protocol