From: | frank_lupo <frank_lupo(at)email(dot)it> |
---|---|
To: | dpage <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
Cc: | pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: reindex action |
Date: | 2003-03-06 14:40:52 |
Message-ID: | HBC0S4$1C0B8019971975BC900007EB54338963@email.it |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: frank_lupo [mailto:frank_lupo(at)email(dot)it]
> > Sent: 05 March 2003 21:13
> > To: pgadmin-hackers
> > Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] reindex action
> >
> >
> > I developed a reindex command (table,index no database).
>
> Sorry Frank - this breaks the OO design of pgSchema. Unless there are
> exceptional circumstances, anything that occurs to an object should be
> implemented as a method of that object, so I would expect to see methods
> like:
>
> pgIndex.ReIndex()
> pgDatabase.ReIndex()
> pgTable.ReIndex()
>
> Can you recode it in that fashion please?
>
> Thanks, Dave.
>
Excuse, I have corrected the schema.
How we make to call these actions?
Bye !!
Frank Lupo (Wolf) !!
/\_ _/\
\ o o /
--ooo-----ooo---
--
Prendi GRATIS l'email universale che... risparmia: http://www.email.it/f
Sponsor:
Stai cercando una casella di posta professionale senza pubblicità e senza scadenza? Quello che fa per te è Email.it Pro15 o Pro50, ordinala subito, è proprio forte!
Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=1045&d=6-3
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
pgDatabase.cls | application/octet-stream | 460 bytes |
pgIndex.cls | application/octet-stream | 389 bytes |
pgTable.cls | application/octet-stream | 387 bytes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2003-03-06 15:04:29 | Re: reindex action |
Previous Message | efesar | 2003-03-06 10:35:01 | Re: PGAdmin 3 Patch // Memory Leaks Fixed // Ignore last patch |