> But the parts that are replacing 'head -1' by 'sed q' should definitely be
> applied. Although I'd prefer 'sed 1q'.
What's wrong with "head -n 1"?? Surely that's compliant if -num params
aren't allowed any more?
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Rod Taylor||Date: 2002-03-12 03:25:27|
|Subject: Re: Domain Support -- another round|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2002-03-12 02:21:27|
|Subject: Re: support for POSIX 1003.1-2001 hosts|