Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: support for POSIX 1003.1-2001 hosts

From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>,"Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Paul Eggert" <eggert(at)twinsun(dot)com>,<pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: support for POSIX 1003.1-2001 hosts
Date: 2002-03-12 02:35:35
Message-ID: GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOAELGCBAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
> But the parts that are replacing 'head -1' by 'sed q' should definitely be
> applied.  Although I'd prefer 'sed 1q'.

What's wrong with "head -n 1"??  Surely that's compliant if -num params
aren't allowed any more?

Chris


In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Rod TaylorDate: 2002-03-12 03:25:27
Subject: Re: Domain Support -- another round
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-03-12 02:21:27
Subject: Re: support for POSIX 1003.1-2001 hosts

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group