On Jun22, 2012, at 06:32 , D'Arcy Cain wrote:
> So I have my type working now but I had to create a new C function
> that take the opposite argument order. Seems redundant but I could
> not see a better way.
There isn't. Postgres itself contains a huge number of such functions,
e.g. for every *lt() (less-than) there's a *gt() (greater-than).
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Dimitri Fontaine||Date: 2012-06-22 12:28:26|
|Subject: Re: Transactions over pathological TCP connections|
|Previous:||From: Andres Freund||Date: 2012-06-22 09:42:10|
|Subject: Re: Catalog/Metadata consistency during changeset extraction from wal|