Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] win32 performance - fsync question

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,"Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>,<pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>,"Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] win32 performance - fsync question
Date: 2005-02-27 19:52:00
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E407B525@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-hackers-win32


-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-hackers-win32-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org on behalf of Bruce Momjian
Sent: Sun 2/27/2005 12:54 AM
To: Magnus Hagander
Cc: Tom Lane; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org; pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org; Merlin Moncure
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] [HACKERS] win32 performance - fsync question
 

> Patch applied.  Thanks.
> 
> I assume this is not approprate for 8.0.X.

I think it would be good to backpatch it given proper testing - the changes are relatively minor, and they do give a significant performance boost.

Regards, Dave

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2005-02-27 20:01:45
Subject: Re: Development Plans
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2005-02-27 18:07:16
Subject: snprintf causes regression tests to fail

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: Merlin MoncureDate: 2005-02-28 13:16:53
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] win32 performance - fsync question
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2005-02-27 18:07:16
Subject: snprintf causes regression tests to fail

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group