Re: 1.4.2?

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: Raphaël Enrici <blacknoz(at)club-internet(dot)fr>
Cc: "Andreas Pflug" <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, "pgadmin-hackers" <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 1.4.2?
Date: 2006-03-06 08:15:36
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4011C921D@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Raphaël Enrici [mailto:blacknoz(at)club-internet(dot)fr]
> Sent: 06 March 2006 08:08
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Andreas Pflug; pgadmin-hackers
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] 1.4.2?
>
> > Mainly because it got overlooked (sorry). It won't go onto
> the stable branch anyway though - we never had a bug report
> about it (just the patch),
>
> At least we got one bug report... see bug #341117 at debian.org [1] :)

s/we/debian :-)

> > and I'm not prepared to modify that code with virtually
> zero field testing to 'fix' it in 1.4.x.
>
> I tested it myself ;) Just joking, I fully understand your position.
> However, can you please consider adding it for next release?
> I'll keep
> trace of it separately in debian packages until it's included
> upstream.

Certainly. Of course, you are welcome to apply a platform specific mod to 1.4.2 for Debian only as it'll obviously work there. I'm more worried aboout breaking Solaris/FreeBSD etc.

Regards, Dave

Responses

  • Re: 1.4.2? at 2006-03-06 08:18:58 from Raphaël Enrici

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Raphaël Enrici 2006-03-06 08:18:58 Re: 1.4.2?
Previous Message Raphaël Enrici 2006-03-06 08:08:24 Re: 1.4.2?