From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | <openmacnews(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Buildproblems on OSX 10.3 due to libxml2 |
Date: | 2006-02-27 16:18:47 |
Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E40103E45B@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: OpenMacNews [mailto:openmacnews(at)gmail(dot)com]
> Sent: 27 February 2006 16:11
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Buildproblems on OSX 10.3 due
> to libxml2
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: RIPEMD160
>
> On 2/27/06 Dave Page wrote:
> > Hmm, actually AC_PROG_RANLIB can go completely - I added
> that when I
> > was
> > playing with the build system recently but then changed tactic, but
> > obviously left that there. Similarly, I doubt you need
> AC_PROG_LIBTOOL
> > in reality.
> >
>
> fair nuf. though without it, glibtoolize complains ... not
> fatally, fwiw.
Why's it even being called? We don't create any libraries at all (and I
never saw any warnings about it on Tiger, or back when I was running
Panther).
Regards, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | OpenMacNews | 2006-02-27 16:26:52 | Re: Buildproblems on OSX 10.3 due to libxml2 |
Previous Message | OpenMacNews | 2006-02-27 16:11:09 | Re: Buildproblems on OSX 10.3 due to libxml2 |